A $100 boots that can be worn for 100 times is better than a $30 boots that can be worn only five times.

[King Belieal]

When we want to decide on buying a cheaper version of a product, we hardly consider costs per usage.

A more expensive product that can be used double the times the cheaper version of the product can be used makes more financial sense.

What do you think?

 

[Kross]

That's where we don't just have to buy something because of cheap prices but for the value that thing carries.

 

[Springtime]

Agree. Products that are durable may save you a lot of money in repair. Cheap and non-durable goods may be broken after using for a while. You need to either buy a replacement or repair it. And that costs you even more money than buying a more expensive and durable product.

 

[Augusta]

Yes that right . You spend good to buy quality shoe that would last you better than one is cheaper and not lasting

 

[Min George]

Many people know this. Just that they may not have the bulk $100 at that time to pay for the products and it is urgent for them to buy.