- Thread Author
- #1
Have you been following the latest drama around OpenAI’s new GPT-4o model? The demo was mind-blowing—real-time voice conversations, emotional tone detection, even interrupting and correcting itself like a human. But now critics are calling it too lifelike, sparking debates about ethics, job displacement, and whether AI is crossing the ‘uncanny valley.’
Some folks love the convenience (imagine an AI tutor that adapts to your frustration!), but others worry about deepfake scams or customer service jobs vanishing overnight. And let’s not forget the irony—OpenAI’s own employees are warning about safety risks while the company races ahead.
What’s your take? Is GPT-4o a game-changer or a slippery slope? Are we ready for AI that feels human, even if it’s not?
Some folks love the convenience (imagine an AI tutor that adapts to your frustration!), but others worry about deepfake scams or customer service jobs vanishing overnight. And let’s not forget the irony—OpenAI’s own employees are warning about safety risks while the company races ahead.
What’s your take? Is GPT-4o a game-changer or a slippery slope? Are we ready for AI that feels human, even if it’s not?