In school, people look at our grades, and in society, people look at our financial capability

[Starmix]

In school, grades serve as a primary metric for evaluating academic performance and potential. They can open doors to opportunities like scholarships, advanced courses, and prestigious universities. However, overemphasizing grades can lead to stress, anxiety, and a narrow focus on test-taking skills rather than genuine learning and creativity. Some argue that grades don’t fully capture a student's intelligence, creativity, or potential, and alternative assessment methods like portfolios, projects, and experiential learning could provide a more holistic view.

In society, financial capacity dictates access to resources, opportunities, and overall quality of life. It influences where you can live, the healthcare you receive, the education you can afford, and even your social circles. However, judging individuals solely on their financial status can perpetuate inequality and discrimination. Many argue that a person’s worth should not be determined by their wealth, and factors like character, contributions to society, and personal values should be given equal or greater consideration.

Both grades and financial capacity can be seen as necessary but imperfect metrics. While they provide a framework for evacuation and opportunity, they also have limitations and potential drawbacks. A balanced perspective recognizes the importance of both while acknowledging their shortcomings and advocating for a more holistic and equitable approach to assessing individuals in both academic and social contexts.

 

[King Belieal]

That is to show you that people have to be conscious of life after school. And that school doesn't guarantee you financial success if you don't have financial intelligence.

 

[Starmix]

Some people in the society are ruthless, they forgot the individual differences and the circumstances why there are rich and poor. The context of judgment is superficial, lacks bearing.