Is staying away from work enough reason to fire a staff?

[Fidelia]

I know that some business owners really frown at a staff skipping work. It disrupts the flow and the operation of the business.

But do you think that staying away from work is enough reason for a business owner to fire a staff?

 

[gwolf666]

I completely understand that when an employee is absent without justification, it can affect business operations. However, I believe that firing someone simply for being absent isn't always the best solution. It's important to investigate the reasons behind the absence. Sometimes, it might be due to personal problems, health issues, or emergencies that require understanding and support. Of course, if an employee is repeatedly absent without notice and without a valid reason, that does demonstrate a lack of commitment and could justify disciplinary action or even dismissal. But in isolated cases or for justifiable reasons, I think the best approach is to talk to the employee, understand their situation, and find solutions. Loyalty and mutual respect also strengthen the working relationship. Firing someone without first analyzing the context can create a negative image and affect the morale of the rest of the team.

 

[Augusta]

No, I don't think so . It would be better to hand such a person a suspension or a query not outrightly sacking the person

 

[eLdavis]

It depends, if the said worker has been doing this for awhile, then dropping them is definitely a good option.

 

[Starmix]

The management can call her attention or send a reprimand letter requesting the employee to explain in 1000 words the reasons why she skips work.

 

[Kross]

When a staff comes to work late, you can give him a query. It is only when it is habitual that you can consider sacking.

 

[King Belieal]

If the employee always has a reason to always come late to work often, they should be relieved from that job. If it is once in a while lateness, a simple fine can handle that.

 

[Kera]

I think instead of sacking the staff, a deduction could be made on her salary. Most staff are made to sign an undertaking promising never to violate the rules governing the organization again and should be punished as agreed in the document.

 

[Augusta]

But the again if an employee is not working consistently. then they are in breach of their contract and can of course be fired.

 

[Kross]

I would never support having to fire a staff because they couldn't make it to work just to once. You have to hear them out first.

 

[Fidelia]

If in the space of one month, a staff stays away from work up to five times, it is perfectly in line to fire such a staff.

 

[Springtime]

That depends on the reason why the staff stays away from work. If the reason is valid, there is no reason to fire him/her. But if s(he) is always absent from work for no reason, it's time to ask him/her to leave.

 

[Augusta]

I would never support having to fire a staff because they couldn't make it to work just to once. You have to hear them out first.

I don't think anyone does that to a one time doer. It is mostly for staff that are consistent with the habits

 

[Stardom22]

As a member of staff, you should inform the management about your absence in advance so that somebody else gets assigned to your place of work.

 

[Augusta]

As a member of staff, you should inform the management about your absence in advance so that somebody else gets assigned to your place of work.

Yeah right this is the right thing to do. But some people wouldn't do this . But then it is wrong to just tire someone just because of this

 

[Kera]

Staying away from work just once or twice is not enough to fire a staff. If it happens everyday, it is in place to fire.