Money as compensation for the loss of a relative: How much can be enough?

[Fidelia]

There are certain circumstances that lead to the death of people and there is need for some compensation through money. Do you think money should be used as compensation for the death of relatives? How much money can really compensate a family for losing a relative?

 

[Kross]

There is no amount of money that can adequately compensate a family that has lost their loved one especially in avoidable circumstances.

 

[Augusta]

No amount can be enough but it is necessary to get it especially if the deceased had children and the money can help the children survive

 

[King Belieal]

No amount can be enough but it is necessary to get it especially if the deceased had children and the money can help the children survive

That money they give the family of not well managed and invested would still finish sooner and the deceased family would still suffer.

 

[Augusta]

That money they give the family of not well managed and invested would still finish sooner and the deceased family would still suffer.

Yeah that's why it should handed to the more responsible person in the family especially if the children are still very young to do anything tangible with the money

 

[Springtime]

I would say as much as possible, especially if the deceased has young children. But make sure the money will be well managed.

 

[eLdavis]

I don't think there is any amount of money one can use to compare the loss of a loved one. Whatever you give them is just for giving sake.

 

[Augusta]

Yee it is to make sure that the money is well managed. That's just the truth. The money should be handed to a very responsible person

I would say as much as possible, especially if the deceased has young children. But make sure the money will be well managed.

it

 

[Suba]

If the relative works or becomes your employee, then apart from receiving insurance money, he will also receive compensation from you and will also receive severance pay, the amount of which is adjusted according to the length of service.

 

[Min George]

If the relative works or becomes your employee, then apart from receiving insurance money, he will also receive compensation from you and will also receive severance pay, the amount of which is adjusted according to the length of service.

Some companies even go as far as employing a relative of the deceased that doesn't have a job to work with the company. That's to keep something coming from the company to the family.

 

[Kera]

For me, I think giving the family of the deceased a guaranteed source of income would be better than giving money.

 

[Augusta]

For me, I think giving the family of the deceased a guaranteed source of income would be better than giving money.

I agree because money gotten might just finished in no time. So giving them a job is better

 

[Kera]

I agree because money gotten might just finished in no time. So giving them a job is better

If the wrong persons are even in charge of the money, it would not even get to be of any benefits to the direct dependents of the deceased.

 

[Augusta]

If the wrong persons are even in charge of the money, it would not even get to be of any benefits to the direct dependents of the deceased.

That's true especially if the money gets into the hands of a greedy person . it is just going to be a huge lose to the deceased family

 

[Stardom22]

In a matter of fact, no mo money that can really fit in place of a lost soul. However one can be given just a token to support their lives for the absence of the deceased one.

 

[Augusta]

Yes, that's it no amount of money would bring back the person but he had children getting the money at least a huge sum would not be a bad idea