Seeking Real-World Experiences With a Timing & Scheduling Analysis Toolkit

[yolikax]

Hello everyone.

I’m exploring a timing and scheduling analysis toolkit widely used in automotive and embedded domains, particularly for evaluating end-to-end latencies, resource utilization, and architectural alternatives.

For those who have integrated it into complex ECU or multicore workflows, how well does it scale as the number of tasks and communication paths grows? Are its modeling abstractions flexible enough for mixing legacy components with new software architectures?

I’m also curious about practical tips for validating results against real measurements.

What pitfalls, configuration issues, or training needs should newcomers be aware of before adopting it for safety-critical development projects in their workflows.

Post automatically merged: Wednesday at 9:27 PM

Hello everyone.

I’m exploring a timing and scheduling analysis toolkit widely used in automotive and embedded domains, particularly for evaluating end-to-end latencies, resource utilization, and architectural alternatives.

For those who have integrated it into complex ECU or multicore workflows, how well does it scale as the number of tasks and communication paths grows? Are its modeling abstractions flexible enough for mixing legacy components with new software architectures?

I’m also curious about practical tips for validating results against real measurements.

What pitfalls, configuration issues, or training needs should newcomers be aware of before adopting https://symtavision.com/ it for safety-critical development projects in their workflows.

thanks in advance for any help