To provoke someone may lead to murder

[Starmix]

Some people have limited patience; they strike right away at someone who triggers their blood to rise, which is why it isn't advisable to stay away from that kind of situation to avoid danger or the commission of a crime.

Legally, provocation can sometimes reduce a charge of murder to manslaughter, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. This is often referred to as voluntary manslaughter or heat-of-the-passion killings.

Also, ethically, whether provocation excuses or mitigates murder is a matter of debate. Some argue that extreme provocation can diminish a person’s moral culpability, while others maintain that taking a life is always wrong, regardless of the circumstances.

Further, under Philippine law, provocation can be a mitigating circumstance that reduces the penalty for a crime. The key factor is whether the provocation was sufficient to produce a loss of reason and self-control in he accused.

 

[The Hulk]

I've got a short fuse but I would never kill someone. One can control themselves from murdering people.

 

[Starmix]

Sometimes murder and assault are inevitable; it is not good to assault someone, for this may lead to crime. Many landed in jail because of provocation which the other party cannot accept and swallow, so they resort to killing the person insulting their face.

 

[eLdavis]

With how the world is to day, i am always careful how i respond to people out there, and how i react, cause the truth is we don't know who is who any longer.

 

[Starmix]

There are individual differences, so we cannot expect people to have the same mindsets and attitudes. Many lack self-control, and patience is limited. It is crucial if we encourage such kind of people. It will be scary.

 

[kit_hung]

Some people have limited patience; they strike right away at someone who triggers their blood to rise, which is why it isn't advisable to stay away from that kind of situation to avoid danger or the commission of a crime.

Legally, provocation can sometimes reduce a charge of murder to manslaughter, depending on the jurisdiction and the specific circumstances. This is often referred to as voluntary manslaughter or heat-of-the-passion killings.

Also, ethically, whether provocation excuses or mitigates murder is a matter of debate. Some argue that extreme provocation can diminish a person’s moral culpability, while others maintain that taking a life is always wrong, regardless of the circumstances.

Further, under Philippine law, provocation can be a mitigating circumstance that reduces the penalty for a crime. The key factor is whether the provocation was sufficient to produce a loss of reason and self-control in he accused.

Provocation is a legally recognized mitigating circumstance, and depending on jurisdiction and specific circumstances, it may reduce the murder to manslaughter, often referred to as a crime of passion. On a moral level, whether incitement can mitigate crime is controversial. Some argue that too much stress will make people lose their minds, others believe that unnecessary suicide is always wrong. Under Philippine law, violence can be considered a mitigating circumstance, resulting in a reduced sentence. The main question is whether the level of provocation is sufficient to cause the defendant to lose his judgment and self-control. This is a very controversial topic.