Place your Ad here for $10.00 per Month!

Paid Offer! Create Posts on Linux Forum - Get Paid $2.00 - New Offer!

When you are short on posting new threads. Rather than forcing new threads, instead I think adding 3 to 4 additional posts = the value of 1 thread. Replies/post are usually easier that finding fresh, realistic and valuable topics to post.

So in short, I'm ok with being a few threads short, only if it's made up by making extra 3+ posts for every missing thread.
 
hydn said:
When you are short on posting new threads. Rather than forcing new threads, instead I think adding 3 to 4 additional posts = the value of 1 thread. Replies/post are usually easier that finding fresh, realistic and valuable topics to post.

So in short, I'm ok with being a few threads short, only if it's made up by making extra 3+ posts for every missing thread.
Click to expand...
I will create 12 extra replies.
 
King Belieal said:
Okay then..I would relax on new threads and focus as I have one thread left to complete the thread count for this task. Would be adding 4 comments to make up for the missing thread.
Click to expand...
Yes, that's fine. If you cannot find great topics/content for new threads, don't force it. Instead, if you come up 2 or 3 threads short, you can post 3 to 4 "quality" replies to existing topics, per missing thread.

New Threads are preferred, but only if they won't be low quality.

For example, this thread: https://linuxcommunity.io/t/building-raid-50-on-ubuntu-how-can-i-go-about-it/3358

It speaks to working on RAID 50 with 4 drives with is impossible.

I know this is a technical niche, so I understand that sometimes this will happen.

I genuinely appreciate the efforts and largely 95% of the threads have been good, so this isn't a BIG issue. I'm just communication so that everyone is aware, and we can continue to improve as you become more used to this linux/tech niche.

Thanks all!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
15,525Threads
112,818Messages
344Members
SphinxLatest member
Top