- Joined
- Sep 25, 2023
- Messages
- 26,559
- Reaction score
- 2,310
- Trophy Points
- 147
- Location
- Philippines
- D Bucks
- 💵4.035050
- Referral Credit
- 100
It's a, NO, for me. I don't know your stand. You might have a good support on this. Well you're free to share it with us here. Why it's a no for me ? It's simply because marketing is not a debate, but on the other side, it could be a one side debate.
The duty of the marketer is to persuade and persuasion is important in debate to let the hearers believe what you want them to believe, and to stir their emotions to feel what you want them to feel.
Bombastic technique follows the same but it's associated with pressure and viewers or listeners may find it hard to refute and counterpropose cornering their beliefs to agree with you to support on what you promote
.
The duty of the marketer is to persuade and persuasion is important in debate to let the hearers believe what you want them to believe, and to stir their emotions to feel what you want them to feel.
Bombastic technique follows the same but it's associated with pressure and viewers or listeners may find it hard to refute and counterpropose cornering their beliefs to agree with you to support on what you promote
