Is it always wrong to kill someone?

[Starmix]

There might be circumstantial cases that lead to the killing of a person, like burglars or rapists. Despite these two possible reasons, the perspective of killing someone is still considered wrong, but it could be mitigated if the crime is robbery or burglary. If the cause is revenge because the spouse is cheating, then proving it will be complex.

While the act of murder is generally considered unlawful and immoral, exceptions and jurisdictions exist under certain circumstances. Many believe that taking a life is inherently wrong due to the sanctity of life and the value placed on human existence.

Further, killing is typically illegal, classified as murder or homicide, and is punishable by law. However, the law often recognizes exceptions such as self-defense, war, and capital punishment, depending on the jurisdiction.

Moreover, whether it is always wrong to kill someone is not a simple yes or no question. While taking life is generally considered wrong, exceptions exist in situations such as self-defense, just war, and capital punishment. But we always hear killing of political rivals, and the culprits are still living in freedom. What is the justice for that? There might be a conspiracy theory.

 

[gwolf666]

I agree that the issue of killing someone is very complex and always generates intense debate. From an ethical standpoint, human life has immense value, and for that reason, we generally consider taking a life wrong. However, when it comes to self-defense or in cases of war, the law recognizes exceptions. What is concerning is the impunity we see in many cases, such as the disappearance of political figures or public officials without any real justice being served. Sometimes, there seems to be a double standard in how the laws are applied, and that breeds distrust in the system. Justice should be equal for everyone, regardless of who the victim or the perpetrator is. The feeling that there are conspiracies or that certain crimes go unpunished only fuels uncertainty and resentment in society. The pursuit of true justice must be a priority for everyone.

 

[eLdavis]

At the end of the day we are in no position to take someone's life no matter what they did. Killing is wrong.

 

[Starmix]

Whatever will be the reason, killing someone remains a crime, thus a criminal needs to be punished by the law. Only those kinds of killings, like in the war and self-defense are considerable by the laws.

 

[kit_hung]

There might be circumstantial cases that lead to the killing of a person, like burglars or rapists. Despite these two possible reasons, the perspective of killing someone is still considered wrong, but it could be mitigated if the crime is robbery or burglary. If the cause is revenge because the spouse is cheating, then proving it will be complex.

While the act of murder is generally considered unlawful and immoral, exceptions and jurisdictions exist under certain circumstances. Many believe that taking a life is inherently wrong due to the sanctity of life and the value placed on human existence.

Further, killing is typically illegal, classified as murder or homicide, and is punishable by law. However, the law often recognizes exceptions such as self-defense, war, and capital punishment, depending on the jurisdiction.

Moreover, whether it is always wrong to kill someone is not a simple yes or no question. While taking life is generally considered wrong, exceptions exist in situations such as self-defense, just war, and capital punishment. But we always hear killing of political rivals, and the culprits are still living in freedom. What is the justice for that? There might be a conspiracy theory.

Killing is generally considered wrongful and illegal, but there are exceptions such as self-defense or capital punishment. one could argue that inducing a loss of control is ethically problematic. Many believe that the sanctity of life always makes it wrong to take a life, but in fact, the legal system sometimes allows exceptions based on specific circumstances. When one hears that a political enemy is being murdered when a murderer is not punished, one cannot hear about the integrity and impartiality of the legal system.

 

[aninditasen]

There might be circumstantial cases that lead to the killing of a person, like burglars or rapists. Despite these two possible reasons, the perspective of killing someone is still considered wrong, but it could be mitigated if the crime is robbery or burglary. If the cause is revenge because the spouse is cheating, then proving it will be complex.

While the act of murder is generally considered unlawful and immoral, exceptions and jurisdictions exist under certain circumstances. Many believe that taking a life is inherently wrong due to the sanctity of life and the value placed on human existence.

Further, killing is typically illegal, classified as murder or homicide, and is punishable by law. However, the law often recognizes exceptions such as self-defense, war, and capital punishment, depending on the jurisdiction.

Moreover, whether it is always wrong to kill someone is not a simple yes or no question. While taking life is generally considered wrong, exceptions exist in situations such as self-defense, just war, and capital punishment. But we always hear killing of political rivals, and the culprits are still living in freedom. What is the justice for that? There might be a conspiracy theory.

In political murders the cases are just suppressed as long as they are in power. The cases are opened as soon as they lose their power. However some women kill their husband in defense after being physically abuse for a long time.

 

[Starmix]

In political murders the cases are just suppressed as long as they are in power. The cases are opened as soon as they lose their power. However some women kill their husband in defense after being physically abuse for a long time.

I agree with you, some wives this time are making the right decision because of the excessive abuses of their husbands. Some wives are battered, others tormented as if they were criminals. Husbands like them need to sleep forever.

 

[eLdavis]

Whatever will be the reason, killing someone remains a crime, thus a criminal needs to be punished by the law. Only those kinds of killings, like in the war and self-defense are considerable by the laws.

Indeed besides killing in the battle field, any other type still remains a crime that would be properly investigated.

 

[Starmix]

Indeed besides killing in the battle field, any other type still remains a crime that would be properly investigated.

Yes, like those killing crimes committed by drug addicts and assassins or hired to kill. Our university president was assassinated 4 years ago while he was about to alight from his van. Until this time, the case remained unsolved. The primary suspect is the wife. The university president was insured for almost 285 million pesos.

 

[wisdom01]

I agree with you, some wives this time are making the right decision because of the excessive abuses of their husbands. Some wives are battered, others tormented as if they were criminals. Husbands like them need to sleep forever.

Abuse is never okay, women deserve respect and safety, leaving toxic relationships takes courage, hope they find support and peace.

 

[Starmix]

Abuse is never okay, women deserve respect and safety, leaving toxic relationships takes courage, hope they find support and peace.

A toxic relationship must not be tolerated, or one of them will die from too much abuse, or one of them will kill just to ease the pain and end the mental and emotional struggle.

 

[wisdom01]

t, toxic relationships can be deadly, get out while you still can, your life depends on it, it's just not worth the risk!