The disadvantage of still keeping a particular staff that has worked for an organization for so long.

[Trush Jodie]

There are staff that have worked for a single organization for up to twenty years. Same job designation for that long. Is there any disadvantage of having a staff that has worked for such a long period in an organization?

 

[King Belieal]

A staff that has worked for 20 years could be valuable to a business. But on the other hand, they might be very difficult to control.

 

[eLdavis]

They might have a feeling of entitlement due to the fact that they have been around in the business for a very long time.

 

[Springtime]

That depends on how the person performs during his/her 20 years of service. If s(he) keeps on updating his/her skills, s(he) can be a valuable asset to the organization.

 

[Min George]

It is supposed to be something positive to have a staff that has worked with your organisation for that long. I don't see negatives here if the staff is valuable. It gives the business a strong succession plan.

Post automatically merged: Aug 5, 2025

It is supposed to be something positive to have a staff that has worked with your organisation for that long. I don't see negatives here if the staff is valuable. It gives the business a strong succession plan.

 

[Augusta]

Well, if they have any bad habits The new staff might tend to copy that as they are following the footsteps of the old staff