- Thread Author
- #1
- Joined
- Sep 25, 2023
- Messages
- 39,369
- Reaction score
- 3,162
- Trophy Points
- 180
- Location
- Philippines
- D Bucks
- 💵8.914200
- Referral Credit
- 100
According to the report, Russia’s reserve stockpiles of T-80 tanks have almost completely disappeared, according to OSINT researcher Covert Cabal. According to the investigation, Russia entered the full-scale war against Ukraine with roughly 1,679 T-80 tanks across active service and storage. After four years of combat and refurbishment cycles, only 134 vehicles remain in storage depots identifiable via satellite imagery.
The report stated that the researcher concluded after reviewing imagery from multiple facilities across Russia. Originally developed during the late Cold War as the Soviet Union’s high-performance counterpart to what would become the US M1 Abrams, the T-80 combined strong firepower with exceptional mobility thanks to its gas-turbine engine, United 24 Media says. Soviet planners envisioned it as a top-tier breakthrough tank, paired with the cheaper and more numerous T-72, designed for mass mobilization warfare. But decades later, the tank’s fate appears very different. At the start of the war, large storage bases held hundreds of T-80s each.
The report said that satellite imagery showed tightly packed rows of armored vehicles awaiting refurbishment. Over time, however, those numbers steadily declined. The analysis identified only three remaining storage sites still holding T-80 tanks, including the 22nd storage base, once home to more than 600 tanks, now shows roughly 80 remaining vehicles. In addition, the 6018th base, where about two dozen heavily deteriorated tanks remain, and the 1311th facility, reduced from around 90 tanks before the war to roughly 26 visible units. Many of the remaining vehicles appear to be in poor condition, suggesting Russia has already drawn from the best preserved reserves. The pattern reflects what analysts have long expected: usable equipment is pulled first, followed by progressively worse examples until refurbishment becomes economically or technically impractical. A key finding of the investigation concerns Russia’s primary T-80 refurbishment plant.
Additionally, tanks flow steadily from storage depots into repair facilities, where they are upgraded into modernized variants such as the T-80BVM before returning to frontline service. Recently, however, satellite imagery suggests a shift. Instead of refurbished tanks leaving the facility, analysts increasingly observed support vehicles built using old T-80 hulls, including armored recovery vehicles and heavy weapons platforms. This may indicate that many remaining hulls are too degraded to be restored as operational tanks. The trend, according to the researcher, could signal that Russia’s remaining T-80 reserves are no longer viable for combat restoration. Unlike some other Soviet-era designs, the T-80 has not been produced from scratch since the early 2000s. Modern variants promoted by Russian officials are largely rebuilt older vehicles rather than newly manufactured tanks.
The report stated that the researcher concluded after reviewing imagery from multiple facilities across Russia. Originally developed during the late Cold War as the Soviet Union’s high-performance counterpart to what would become the US M1 Abrams, the T-80 combined strong firepower with exceptional mobility thanks to its gas-turbine engine, United 24 Media says. Soviet planners envisioned it as a top-tier breakthrough tank, paired with the cheaper and more numerous T-72, designed for mass mobilization warfare. But decades later, the tank’s fate appears very different. At the start of the war, large storage bases held hundreds of T-80s each.
The report said that satellite imagery showed tightly packed rows of armored vehicles awaiting refurbishment. Over time, however, those numbers steadily declined. The analysis identified only three remaining storage sites still holding T-80 tanks, including the 22nd storage base, once home to more than 600 tanks, now shows roughly 80 remaining vehicles. In addition, the 6018th base, where about two dozen heavily deteriorated tanks remain, and the 1311th facility, reduced from around 90 tanks before the war to roughly 26 visible units. Many of the remaining vehicles appear to be in poor condition, suggesting Russia has already drawn from the best preserved reserves. The pattern reflects what analysts have long expected: usable equipment is pulled first, followed by progressively worse examples until refurbishment becomes economically or technically impractical. A key finding of the investigation concerns Russia’s primary T-80 refurbishment plant.
Additionally, tanks flow steadily from storage depots into repair facilities, where they are upgraded into modernized variants such as the T-80BVM before returning to frontline service. Recently, however, satellite imagery suggests a shift. Instead of refurbished tanks leaving the facility, analysts increasingly observed support vehicles built using old T-80 hulls, including armored recovery vehicles and heavy weapons platforms. This may indicate that many remaining hulls are too degraded to be restored as operational tanks. The trend, according to the researcher, could signal that Russia’s remaining T-80 reserves are no longer viable for combat restoration. Unlike some other Soviet-era designs, the T-80 has not been produced from scratch since the early 2000s. Modern variants promoted by Russian officials are largely rebuilt older vehicles rather than newly manufactured tanks.