Welcome to Discussion Bucks

Earn Cash While You Engage!

Join the ultimate paid-to-post forum where your opinions earn you real cash! 🌟 💵 Earn While You Post: Share your thoughts and watch your earnings grow. 🌐 Global Community: Connect with members worldwide. 🎁 Exclusive Perks: Enjoy rewards and VIP perks. Get Started in Minutes!

SignUp Now!
  • Welcome to our community! 🌟 Don't miss out on the latest Events and Paid Offers available exclusively in our Community Events & Paid Offers Section. Dive in now to explore and benefit! 💼
    💰 Paid Offers Available! Surprise — we have 4 running!💰

Do you think Wikipedia is still relevant for information in this age of AI?

King Belieal

Discussion Guru
Bronze Supporter
Literary Virtuoso
Registered Member
Joined
Oct 1, 2023
Messages
7,550
Reaction score
384
Trophy Points
9
Location
Nigeria
D Bucks
💵0.492605
Referral Credit
0
Wikipedia used to be the number one source of information for many people. But it seems a lot of people now rely on Generative AI for information.

Do you think that Generative AI would be the end of Wikipedia?
 
Hi, I think the emergence of generative artificial intelligence won't necessarily be the end of Wikipedia, but it could significantly change how we search for information. Wikipedia has the advantage of being a collaborative encyclopedia, with a vast amount of verifiable and constantly updated content, making it reliable for many people. However, generative AI offers quick and convenient answers, making it very attractive to those who want immediate responses. The problem is that AI can still generate inaccurate or biased information, and it doesn't always have the sources or references that Wikipedia provides. Therefore, I believe both can coexist if they complement each other: Wikipedia as a reliable and verifiable source, and AI as a tool for obtaining quick and concise answers. The important thing will be learning to use each one correctly and responsibly.
 
Back
Top Bottom